State Public Safety Grant Guide
Minnesota Public Safety Grants
Funding pathways, FY 2026 JAG allocations and Minnesota-specific drone, data and cybersecurity rules.
Minnesota agencies can use state-administered justice and emergency management programs, direct federal grants and subsidized cybersecurity services when a project fits its notice. Before specifying aircraft, cameras, radios or cloud services, identify the buyer, all charged funding sources and applicable operating rules.
Minnesota Statutes § 626.19 contains substantial law-enforcement UAS requirements. MNIT also publishes a 2026 supply-chain risk standard for executive-branch entities and its vendors. Review the separate federal frameworks in MAXSUR’s NDAA, TAA, FCC & Blue UAS guide.
Planning update: The old page relied on projected dates and FY2024 formula figures and described the state as having no UAS ban. This version uses current FY2026 Local JAG allocations and explains Minnesota’s operative police UAS law. Award eligibility and equipment approval must still be checked with each administrator.
Minnesota Procurement & Cybersecurity
What Minnesota Buyers Should Check Before Selecting Cameras or Drones
State operational law, cyber controls and federal award restrictions each attach in different circumstances.
§ 626.19
Warrant baseline, enumerated exceptions, public process and records duties.
72-hour report
Public agencies report to MNIT; affected vendors notify the agency.
MNIT intake
SLCGP and SSMI support eligible local partners with subsidized tools.
Separate UAS tests
ASDA award restrictions and BJA express prior approval may govern costs.
Minnesota Police UAS Law
Section 626.19 generally requires a search warrant for law-enforcement UAV use. Subdivision 3 authorizes defined circumstances, including life-safety emergencies, certain public events, disaster response, serious road-crash reconstruction and active missing-person searches. Officers must comply with FAA requirements, document each use with a unique case number and factual basis, and identify the exception when no warrant was obtained.
Before purchase or use, the agency must allow public comment; a local budget governing body must offer comment at a regular meeting. Before operation the chief officer must establish a written policy, publish it on the agency website if one exists, and report annual deployment and program-cost data to DPS by January 15.
Privacy, Data and Retention
Section 626.19 prohibits weaponizing police UAVs. Facial recognition or other biometric matching requires express warrant authorization. Collecting protest or demonstration data requires a warrant or a listed exception. UAV data are classified under Minnesota data-practices law; law-enforcement UAV data generally must be deleted as soon as possible and within seven days unless part of an active criminal investigation.
Specify retention, access logs, redaction, evidence export and cloud controls before connecting a system. Other government-entity data remain subject to chapter 13 classification.
State Supply Chain and Cyber Reporting
MNIT’s June 2026 Supply Chain Risk Management Standard applies to Minnesota executive-branch state entities and their vendors/contractors. It calls for risk planning, supplier review, acquisition controls and assessment of systems and components. A city or county should follow its own procurement and IT requirements; the state standard does not automatically bind all local buyers.
Under § 16E.36, a public agency reports a cybersecurity incident affecting it to MNIT within 72 hours of reasonable identification or belief. An affected government contractor or vendor reports to the public agency within that period. Build supplier notice, breach response and evidence handling into the contract.
Federal Funds and Country of Origin
OMB M-26-02 Appendix D implements the American Security Drone Act restriction on using federal award funds, from December 22, 2025, to procure or in connection with operating a FASC-prohibited UAS, subject to stated exemptions and waivers. A locally bought aircraft is not a workaround for federally charged operation; neither does receiving a grant automatically prohibit every locally funded system.
NDAA Section 889, applicable TAA clauses, the FCC Covered List, ASDA and Blue UAS are distinct tests. Check the specific contract and award language and the actual manufacturer, components, communications links, firmware and cloud services.
BJA UAS Approval and Cyber Funding
BJA awards, including JAG, require express prior approval for UAS purchases. Its certification addresses DCMA Blue UAS Cleared List status, Commerce screening, accessories/modifications, federal information, privacy and cybersecurity. Counter-UAS systems have separate approval and authority requirements.
MNIT’s Whole-of-State plan provides subsidized security services through SLCGP and SSMI. Its program page places counties and port cities with SSMI, with other listed entities generally served through SLCGP; complete the participant survey and contact a Cyber Navigator for the applicable service and subsidy. This is not a general aircraft-purchase grant.
Practical Minnesota UAS Procurement Checklist
- Map the funding and mission. Identify purchaser, direct and pass-through awards, operating charges, planned aircraft use and data systems.
- Complete public process. Provide § 626.19 public comment before purchase or use and adopt and post the written agency UAS policy before operation.
- Document flight authority. Identify a warrant or a specific subdivision 3 exception; follow FAA rules and log each flight with a case number and factual basis.
- Plan privacy and retention. No weapons; biometric matching requires a warrant. Address protest data, classification and seven-day deletion unless the active-investigation exception applies.
- Review vendors and cyber controls. For state executive-branch systems apply MNIT supply-chain standard; assess components, software, cloud, remote access and vendor data flows.
- Screen federal award use. Apply OMB M-26-02 Appendix D to award-funded procurement or operation of FASC-prohibited UAS, subject to stated exceptions and waivers.
- Get approval and keep records. For BJA UAS purchases obtain express prior approval; retain certifications, list checks, cost allocation, policy and annual-report evidence.
Federal framework: Read NDAA, TAA, FCC & Blue UAS Explained for the separate federal tests. Verify the live lists, contract clauses and award terms before a purchase.
Funding Pathways
Minnesota Grant Opportunities
The linked administrator controls applicant eligibility, allowable costs, current deadlines and award conditions. A program page is not an open notice.
| Grant | Level | Source | Best Fit / Technology | Deadline Status |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| BJA – FY 2026 Local JAG Formula | Federal direct | BJA | Listed local governments; allowable justice programs and prior-approved UAS | Oct. 9 Grants.gov; Oct. 16 JustGrants, 2026 |
| DPS OJP – Byrne JAG State Program | Federal pass-through | DPS OJP / BJA | State-awarded crime prevention, justice systems and allowable equipment | Check next state RFP |
| DPS OJP – Byrne State Crisis Intervention | Federal pass-through | DPS OJP / BJA | Crisis intervention and behavioral-health programs under state notice | Check state RFP |
| DPS OJP – Community Crime Intervention and Prevention | State | DPS OJP | Community crime prevention and intervention; project-specific technology | FY26–27 RFP closed; check next notice |
| DPS OJP – Crisis Response | State | DPS OJP | Crisis response programming and coordination | 2026–28 RFP closed; check next notice |
| DPS BCA – Automobile Theft Prevention | State | DPS BCA | Eligible vehicle-theft investigators and prevention projects | 2026–29 dedicated grant cycle; check next RFP |
| DPS HSEM – State Homeland Security Program | Federal pass-through | HSEM / FEMA | Risk-based preparedness, allowable equipment and planning | Check HSEM state process |
| DPS HSEM – Urban Area Security Initiative | Federal pass-through | HSEM / FEMA | Regional high-threat preparedness and approved capability | Check regional process |
| DPS HSEM – Emergency Management Performance | Federal pass-through | HSEM / FEMA | Emergency management planning and capacity | Check HSEM cycle |
| DPS HSEM – Nonprofit Security Grant | Federal pass-through | HSEM / FEMA | Eligible high-risk nonprofit physical and cyber security | Check next state notice |
| DPS OTS – Highway Safety Grants | Federal pass-through | OTS / NHTSA | Approved traffic safety enforcement, outreach and education | Check OTS grant cycle |
| MNIT – Whole-of-State Cybersecurity / SLCGP | Federal and state | MNIT / FEMA-CISA | Subsidized local cybersecurity services, not a general UAS equipment fund | Participant survey and Cyber Navigator intake |
| MNIT – Statewide Security Monitoring Initiative | State grant-funded | MNIT | Subsidized monitoring and cyber services for counties and port cities | Contact Cyber Navigators |
| POST – Agency Training Reimbursement | State | MN POST Board | Eligible officer continuing education costs | Annual reimbursement; verify current instructions |
| DNR – OHV Safety Enforcement 2026–27 | State | Minnesota DNR | County sheriff OHV field enforcement and safety education | Biennial application closed Sept. 12, 2025 |
| DNR – Snowmobile Safety Enforcement 2026–27 | State | Minnesota DNR | County sheriff snowmobile enforcement and training | Biennial application closed Sept. 12, 2025 |
| DNR – County Boat and Water Safety | State / federal | Minnesota DNR | County sheriff boating patrol and water safety | County grant process; confirm DNR cycle |
| BJA – Body-Worn Camera Partnership | Federal direct | BJA | BWC deployment, policy and digital evidence | Check BJA NOFO |
| BJA – STOP School Violence | Federal direct | BJA | Threat assessment and eligible school-safety projects | Check BJA NOFO |
| COPS – School Violence Prevention | Federal direct | COPS Office | Allowable school security equipment and coordination | Check COPS NOFO |
| COPS – Hiring Program | Federal direct | COPS Office | Sworn officer positions; equipment is not primary focus | Check COPS NOFO |
| BJA – Bulletproof Vest Partnership | Federal direct | BJA | Eligible ballistic vest reimbursement | Check BVP application cycle |
Near-term direct opportunity: FY2026 Local JAG closes October 9, 2026 at 11:59 p.m. Eastern in Grants.gov and October 16 at 8:59 p.m. Eastern in JustGrants. The DNR OHV and snowmobile 2026–27 awards are in an existing biennial cycle, not open new applications. Check administrator and internal deadlines.
FY 2026 Formula Snapshot
Minnesota Local JAG Allocations
Selected BJA formula allocations, not awards or approval for a specific product. Joint groups appear once.
| Jurisdiction / Group | FY26 Amount | Applicant Note |
|---|---|---|
| Hennepin County group (Minneapolis and five other cities) | $714,924 | Joint; one fiscal agent |
| Ramsey County / St. Paul | $257,632 | Joint; one fiscal agent |
| Stearns County / St. Cloud | $34,918 | Joint; one fiscal agent |
| Dakota County / Apple Valley / Burnsville | $34,206 | Joint; one fiscal agent |
| Anoka County / Coon Rapids / Fridley | $29,935 | Joint; one fiscal agent |
| St. Louis County / Duluth | $27,483 | Joint; one fiscal agent |
| Olmsted County / Rochester | $26,692 | Joint; one fiscal agent |
| Clay County / Moorhead | $23,331 | Joint; one fiscal agent |
| Maplewood | $18,704 | Direct |
| Roseville | $15,185 | Direct |
BJA lists a $1,231,650 Minnesota local total. This selected table is not the full allocation sheet. A joint group chooses one fiscal agent and records its distribution in a memorandum of understanding. View complete FY26 Minnesota allocation sheet.
Minnesota UAS Procurement FAQ
Common Minnesota Compliance Questions
Confirm the agency, mission, funding source and current award terms before buying or flying.
Does Minnesota ban drones based on country of origin?
The reviewed Minnesota UAV statute, section 626.19, regulates law-enforcement use rather than creating a blanket manufacturer blacklist. State executive-branch supply-chain requirements, local procurement policy and federal funding rules can impose additional checks.
Can a Minnesota police agency fly without a search warrant?
Section 626.19 generally requires a warrant, but subdivision 3 lists specific authorized uses such as emergencies involving risk of death or bodily harm, certain public events, serious crash reconstruction, disaster response and active searches for missing people. Document the legal basis for every deployment.
What must an agency do before buying or using a UAV?
Section 626.19 requires an opportunity for public comment before purchase or use, including a local governing-body meeting, and a written agency policy before operation. Check FAA authority, flight documentation, data handling and annual reporting.
How long may police retain UAV data?
Section 626.19 generally requires deletion as soon as possible and no later than seven days after collection unless data is part of an active criminal investigation. Other chapter 13 classification rules still apply.
Does paying locally remove federal award restrictions?
A local-only purchase does not automatically make every federal acquisition rule applicable. Under OMB M-26-02 Appendix D, federal award funds generally cannot be used to procure or in connection with operating a FASC-prohibited UAS, subject to exemptions and waivers. Review each funded cost and award term.
Can Minnesota Local JAG funds buy a police drone?
BJA-funded UAS purchases require express prior approval and the current UAS certification. Check the DCMA Blue UAS Cleared List, Commerce screening and BJA privacy and cybersecurity conditions. A formula allocation is not a product approval.
How does Minnesota subsidize cybersecurity?
MNIT offers Whole-of-State security services through SLCGP and its Statewide Security Monitoring Initiative. Its page places counties and port cities under SSMI and directs interested entities to a participant survey and Cyber Navigators.
Are NDAA Section 889, TAA, FCC and Blue UAS the same rule?
No. They address different contracts, equipment, award funds and approval paths. Apply only the requirements that actually attach to the buyer, funding source, contract and complete system.
MAXSUR Solution Pathways
Connect Minnesota Funding to Field Capability
Match equipment, training and cyber controls to an approved mission and budget.
Procurement Pathway
Move From Grant Approval to a Documented Purchase
Confirm § 626.19 public process, applicable cyber review, federal award conditions and any BJA UAS approval before ordering.
A cooperative contract does not waive purchasing rules or award terms. Confirm the method and product with the administrator and procurement office.