State Public Safety Grant Guide

Minnesota Public Safety Grants

Funding pathways, FY 2026 JAG allocations and Minnesota-specific drone, data and cybersecurity rules.

Grant pathways22
FY26 local JAG allocation$1,231,650
Police UAS law§ 626.19
State fiscal yearJul 1 – Jun 30

Minnesota agencies can use state-administered justice and emergency management programs, direct federal grants and subsidized cybersecurity services when a project fits its notice. Before specifying aircraft, cameras, radios or cloud services, identify the buyer, all charged funding sources and applicable operating rules.

Minnesota Statutes § 626.19 contains substantial law-enforcement UAS requirements. MNIT also publishes a 2026 supply-chain risk standard for executive-branch entities and its vendors. Review the separate federal frameworks in MAXSUR’s NDAA, TAA, FCC & Blue UAS guide.

UAS OperationsMinn. Stat. § 626.19
Cyber Incident ReportingMNIT reporting portal
Local Cyber ServicesMNIT Whole-of-State
State Supply ChainMNIT 2026 standard
County EnforcementDNR enforcement grants
Federal Award UAS RuleOMB M-26-02 Appendix D

Planning update: The old page relied on projected dates and FY2024 formula figures and described the state as having no UAS ban. This version uses current FY2026 Local JAG allocations and explains Minnesota’s operative police UAS law. Award eligibility and equipment approval must still be checked with each administrator.

Minnesota Procurement & Cybersecurity

What Minnesota Buyers Should Check Before Selecting Cameras or Drones

State operational law, cyber controls and federal award restrictions each attach in different circumstances.

Reviewed Sep. 28, 2026

Current snapshot: Minnesota § 626.19 is an enacted law governing law-enforcement UAV deployments and data; it is not a statewide brand blacklist. MNIT’s supply-chain risk standard applies to executive-branch state entities and their vendors. Local agencies have their own purchasing policies and must meet the state UAS and cyber incident rules applicable to them.

Police UAS use

§ 626.19

Warrant baseline, enumerated exceptions, public process and records duties.

Cyber incidents

72-hour report

Public agencies report to MNIT; affected vendors notify the agency.

Cyber services

MNIT intake

SLCGP and SSMI support eligible local partners with subsidized tools.

Federal funds

Separate UAS tests

ASDA award restrictions and BJA express prior approval may govern costs.

Minnesota Police UAS Law

Section 626.19 generally requires a search warrant for law-enforcement UAV use. Subdivision 3 authorizes defined circumstances, including life-safety emergencies, certain public events, disaster response, serious road-crash reconstruction and active missing-person searches. Officers must comply with FAA requirements, document each use with a unique case number and factual basis, and identify the exception when no warrant was obtained.

Before purchase or use, the agency must allow public comment; a local budget governing body must offer comment at a regular meeting. Before operation the chief officer must establish a written policy, publish it on the agency website if one exists, and report annual deployment and program-cost data to DPS by January 15.

Privacy, Data and Retention

Section 626.19 prohibits weaponizing police UAVs. Facial recognition or other biometric matching requires express warrant authorization. Collecting protest or demonstration data requires a warrant or a listed exception. UAV data are classified under Minnesota data-practices law; law-enforcement UAV data generally must be deleted as soon as possible and within seven days unless part of an active criminal investigation.

Specify retention, access logs, redaction, evidence export and cloud controls before connecting a system. Other government-entity data remain subject to chapter 13 classification.

State Supply Chain and Cyber Reporting

MNIT’s June 2026 Supply Chain Risk Management Standard applies to Minnesota executive-branch state entities and their vendors/contractors. It calls for risk planning, supplier review, acquisition controls and assessment of systems and components. A city or county should follow its own procurement and IT requirements; the state standard does not automatically bind all local buyers.

Under § 16E.36, a public agency reports a cybersecurity incident affecting it to MNIT within 72 hours of reasonable identification or belief. An affected government contractor or vendor reports to the public agency within that period. Build supplier notice, breach response and evidence handling into the contract.

Federal Funds and Country of Origin

OMB M-26-02 Appendix D implements the American Security Drone Act restriction on using federal award funds, from December 22, 2025, to procure or in connection with operating a FASC-prohibited UAS, subject to stated exemptions and waivers. A locally bought aircraft is not a workaround for federally charged operation; neither does receiving a grant automatically prohibit every locally funded system.

NDAA Section 889, applicable TAA clauses, the FCC Covered List, ASDA and Blue UAS are distinct tests. Check the specific contract and award language and the actual manufacturer, components, communications links, firmware and cloud services.

BJA UAS Approval and Cyber Funding

BJA awards, including JAG, require express prior approval for UAS purchases. Its certification addresses DCMA Blue UAS Cleared List status, Commerce screening, accessories/modifications, federal information, privacy and cybersecurity. Counter-UAS systems have separate approval and authority requirements.

MNIT’s Whole-of-State plan provides subsidized security services through SLCGP and SSMI. Its program page places counties and port cities with SSMI, with other listed entities generally served through SLCGP; complete the participant survey and contact a Cyber Navigator for the applicable service and subsidy. This is not a general aircraft-purchase grant.

Practical Minnesota UAS Procurement Checklist

  1. Map the funding and mission. Identify purchaser, direct and pass-through awards, operating charges, planned aircraft use and data systems.
  2. Complete public process. Provide § 626.19 public comment before purchase or use and adopt and post the written agency UAS policy before operation.
  3. Document flight authority. Identify a warrant or a specific subdivision 3 exception; follow FAA rules and log each flight with a case number and factual basis.
  4. Plan privacy and retention. No weapons; biometric matching requires a warrant. Address protest data, classification and seven-day deletion unless the active-investigation exception applies.
  5. Review vendors and cyber controls. For state executive-branch systems apply MNIT supply-chain standard; assess components, software, cloud, remote access and vendor data flows.
  6. Screen federal award use. Apply OMB M-26-02 Appendix D to award-funded procurement or operation of FASC-prohibited UAS, subject to stated exceptions and waivers.
  7. Get approval and keep records. For BJA UAS purchases obtain express prior approval; retain certifications, list checks, cost allocation, policy and annual-report evidence.

Federal framework: Read NDAA, TAA, FCC & Blue UAS Explained for the separate federal tests. Verify the live lists, contract clauses and award terms before a purchase.

Funding Pathways

Minnesota Grant Opportunities

The linked administrator controls applicant eligibility, allowable costs, current deadlines and award conditions. A program page is not an open notice.

Grant Level Source Best Fit / Technology Deadline Status
BJA – FY 2026 Local JAG Formula Federal direct BJA Listed local governments; allowable justice programs and prior-approved UAS Oct. 9 Grants.gov; Oct. 16 JustGrants, 2026
DPS OJP – Byrne JAG State Program Federal pass-through DPS OJP / BJA State-awarded crime prevention, justice systems and allowable equipment Check next state RFP
DPS OJP – Byrne State Crisis Intervention Federal pass-through DPS OJP / BJA Crisis intervention and behavioral-health programs under state notice Check state RFP
DPS OJP – Community Crime Intervention and Prevention State DPS OJP Community crime prevention and intervention; project-specific technology FY26–27 RFP closed; check next notice
DPS OJP – Crisis Response State DPS OJP Crisis response programming and coordination 2026–28 RFP closed; check next notice
DPS BCA – Automobile Theft Prevention State DPS BCA Eligible vehicle-theft investigators and prevention projects 2026–29 dedicated grant cycle; check next RFP
DPS HSEM – State Homeland Security Program Federal pass-through HSEM / FEMA Risk-based preparedness, allowable equipment and planning Check HSEM state process
DPS HSEM – Urban Area Security Initiative Federal pass-through HSEM / FEMA Regional high-threat preparedness and approved capability Check regional process
DPS HSEM – Emergency Management Performance Federal pass-through HSEM / FEMA Emergency management planning and capacity Check HSEM cycle
DPS HSEM – Nonprofit Security Grant Federal pass-through HSEM / FEMA Eligible high-risk nonprofit physical and cyber security Check next state notice
DPS OTS – Highway Safety Grants Federal pass-through OTS / NHTSA Approved traffic safety enforcement, outreach and education Check OTS grant cycle
MNIT – Whole-of-State Cybersecurity / SLCGP Federal and state MNIT / FEMA-CISA Subsidized local cybersecurity services, not a general UAS equipment fund Participant survey and Cyber Navigator intake
MNIT – Statewide Security Monitoring Initiative State grant-funded MNIT Subsidized monitoring and cyber services for counties and port cities Contact Cyber Navigators
POST – Agency Training Reimbursement State MN POST Board Eligible officer continuing education costs Annual reimbursement; verify current instructions
DNR – OHV Safety Enforcement 2026–27 State Minnesota DNR County sheriff OHV field enforcement and safety education Biennial application closed Sept. 12, 2025
DNR – Snowmobile Safety Enforcement 2026–27 State Minnesota DNR County sheriff snowmobile enforcement and training Biennial application closed Sept. 12, 2025
DNR – County Boat and Water Safety State / federal Minnesota DNR County sheriff boating patrol and water safety County grant process; confirm DNR cycle
BJA – Body-Worn Camera Partnership Federal direct BJA BWC deployment, policy and digital evidence Check BJA NOFO
BJA – STOP School Violence Federal direct BJA Threat assessment and eligible school-safety projects Check BJA NOFO
COPS – School Violence Prevention Federal direct COPS Office Allowable school security equipment and coordination Check COPS NOFO
COPS – Hiring Program Federal direct COPS Office Sworn officer positions; equipment is not primary focus Check COPS NOFO
BJA – Bulletproof Vest Partnership Federal direct BJA Eligible ballistic vest reimbursement Check BVP application cycle

Near-term direct opportunity: FY2026 Local JAG closes October 9, 2026 at 11:59 p.m. Eastern in Grants.gov and October 16 at 8:59 p.m. Eastern in JustGrants. The DNR OHV and snowmobile 2026–27 awards are in an existing biennial cycle, not open new applications. Check administrator and internal deadlines.

FY 2026 Formula Snapshot

Minnesota Local JAG Allocations

Selected BJA formula allocations, not awards or approval for a specific product. Joint groups appear once.

Jurisdiction / Group FY26 Amount Applicant Note
Hennepin County group (Minneapolis and five other cities) $714,924 Joint; one fiscal agent
Ramsey County / St. Paul $257,632 Joint; one fiscal agent
Stearns County / St. Cloud $34,918 Joint; one fiscal agent
Dakota County / Apple Valley / Burnsville $34,206 Joint; one fiscal agent
Anoka County / Coon Rapids / Fridley $29,935 Joint; one fiscal agent
St. Louis County / Duluth $27,483 Joint; one fiscal agent
Olmsted County / Rochester $26,692 Joint; one fiscal agent
Clay County / Moorhead $23,331 Joint; one fiscal agent
Maplewood $18,704 Direct
Roseville $15,185 Direct

BJA lists a $1,231,650 Minnesota local total. This selected table is not the full allocation sheet. A joint group chooses one fiscal agent and records its distribution in a memorandum of understanding. View complete FY26 Minnesota allocation sheet.

Minnesota UAS Procurement FAQ

Common Minnesota Compliance Questions

Confirm the agency, mission, funding source and current award terms before buying or flying.

Does Minnesota ban drones based on country of origin?

The reviewed Minnesota UAV statute, section 626.19, regulates law-enforcement use rather than creating a blanket manufacturer blacklist. State executive-branch supply-chain requirements, local procurement policy and federal funding rules can impose additional checks.

Can a Minnesota police agency fly without a search warrant?

Section 626.19 generally requires a warrant, but subdivision 3 lists specific authorized uses such as emergencies involving risk of death or bodily harm, certain public events, serious crash reconstruction, disaster response and active searches for missing people. Document the legal basis for every deployment.

What must an agency do before buying or using a UAV?

Section 626.19 requires an opportunity for public comment before purchase or use, including a local governing-body meeting, and a written agency policy before operation. Check FAA authority, flight documentation, data handling and annual reporting.

How long may police retain UAV data?

Section 626.19 generally requires deletion as soon as possible and no later than seven days after collection unless data is part of an active criminal investigation. Other chapter 13 classification rules still apply.

Does paying locally remove federal award restrictions?

A local-only purchase does not automatically make every federal acquisition rule applicable. Under OMB M-26-02 Appendix D, federal award funds generally cannot be used to procure or in connection with operating a FASC-prohibited UAS, subject to exemptions and waivers. Review each funded cost and award term.

Can Minnesota Local JAG funds buy a police drone?

BJA-funded UAS purchases require express prior approval and the current UAS certification. Check the DCMA Blue UAS Cleared List, Commerce screening and BJA privacy and cybersecurity conditions. A formula allocation is not a product approval.

How does Minnesota subsidize cybersecurity?

MNIT offers Whole-of-State security services through SLCGP and its Statewide Security Monitoring Initiative. Its page places counties and port cities under SSMI and directs interested entities to a participant survey and Cyber Navigators.

Are NDAA Section 889, TAA, FCC and Blue UAS the same rule?

No. They address different contracts, equipment, award funds and approval paths. Apply only the requirements that actually attach to the buyer, funding source, contract and complete system.

Procurement Pathway

Move From Grant Approval to a Documented Purchase

Confirm § 626.19 public process, applicable cyber review, federal award conditions and any BJA UAS approval before ordering.

A cooperative contract does not waive purchasing rules or award terms. Confirm the method and product with the administrator and procurement office.